Thursday, 4 February 2010

Abracadabra! Or Alakazam! Or Open Sesame!...Or The Latest Incantation; "Can I Fcuk You Today?"

The following transcript is the juicy part of proceedings on Day 1 of the "Sodomy; The Sequel" trial. Whether the alleged sodomizer is guilty or not, there will always be detractors. Personally, I am neutral about whether Anwar did it or did not do it...he may have done it. What is it about smoke and fire?

However, it has come to a point of pointlessness because the most important issue is; whether Anwar in jail again for sodomy or cleared of the charge, two mutually exclusive results will follow: BN to fall or win in the next GE.


The plaintiff was the first on the stand and his opening testimony is nothing short of sensational; sensational only because it gives new approbation to come-on lines. If a mere. "Can I fcuk you today" can get the fcuks, then the world would be a better place for the fcuk-deprived. In this case apparently an ass-hole bandit can even get to plug a seemingly straight male "sodomee" who was about to get married to a seemingly real woman. From two "No's" to a "Yes" (he went to the bathroom and came out wrapped in a towel after saying "no" twice) it did not take too much convincing nor intimidation. Sheeeesh! "Open Sesame!!! And the bugger will bend over! Yeah, right!

I can imagine the world tomorrow. Everyone going around greeting each other; "Can I fcuk you today?"

Judge for yourself:



****************************************************

Di hadapan Yang Arif Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah [hari #2]

[03:05 pm]
Dato’ Mohd Yusof: Memperkenalkan pihak-pihak

Bagi Pihak Pendakwa Raya: Dato’ Mohd Yusof (MY), Hanafiah Zakaria (HZ), Dato’ Nordin Hassan(NH), Wong Chiang Kiat (CK), Noorin Badaruddin (NB), Farah Azlina Latif (FA), Mira Mirna bt Musa dan Naidatul Atirah bt Azman.

Bagi Pihak Anwar Ibrahim (AI): Karpal Singh(KS), Paracumaraswamy(PC), Sankara Nair(SN) – Tidak Hadir, CV Prabakaran(CV), Ram Karpal (RK), Marissa Regina Fernando(M) dan Wan Anuar Shahdat (WAS)

Watching Brief: Zamri Idrus (S), Rajpal Singh, Andy Yong dan N.S. Leong (Majlis Peguam), Kailesh (for Prof. Dr. M. Ariff)

Pemerhati: Mark Trowell, Queen Council for the Law Asia, Commonwealth Lawyer’s Association and International Court of Justice
Jennifer Robinson for IBA.

******************************************

A: Lepas serah dokumen, kami bincang tenteng jadual kerja, tidak lama selepas itu beliau tanya satu soalan.

Q: Apa soalan itu?

“Can I fuck you today?”

Q: Apa reaksi kamu ketika diajukan soalan itu?

A: Marah dan takut

Q: Ada kamu kata apa-apa?

A: Tolak pelawaannya

Q: Apa kamu kata bila menolak?

A: Saya kata saya tak mahu melakukannya

Q: AI kata apa-apa, bila kamu kata tak nak melakukannya?

A: Dengan nada marah AI kata “what?”

Q: Apa respon kamu?

A: Saya ulang yang sama

Q: Seterusnya?

A: AI agak marah dengan itu saya takut. AI arahkan ke bilik tidur utama.

Q: Adakah kamu ke bilik tidur utama seperti diarahkan?

A: Ya

Q: Siapa pergi dulu?

A: Saya pergi dulu

Q; Dalam bilik utama apa berlaku?

A: Dalam bilik utama AI pergi ke hujang bilik untuk tutup langsir. Saya ketika itu masih ada di pintu, kemudian AI pergi ke pintu untuk tutup lampu bilik.

Q: Jadi gelap la bilik itu?

A: Ada cahaya dari pintu tandas dan celah-celah langsir

Q: Lepas itu?

A: AI arahkan saya membersihkan diri di dalam tandas

Q: Tandas atau bilik air?

A: Bilik air

Q: AI arahkan bersih diri?

A: Ya

Q: Teruskan?

A: Ya, saya masuk ke tandas dengan berpakaian, saya bilas badan tetapi saya tak mandi sepenuhnya.

Q: Masa itu dah buka pakaian?

A: Ya

Q: Lepas bilas diri?

A: Saya ambil tuala dalam tandas, saya keluar dengan bawa baju kemeja saya kaler putih dan gantung di tempat pemegang almari.

Q: Kamu bertuala?

A: Saya bertuala.

Q: Masa keluar dari bilik air, nampak di mana AI?

A: Saya nampak, AI di hujung penjuru katil, dibahagian kaki sebelah kanan.

Q: Apa AI buat pada masa itu?

A: Dia berdiri pakai tuala putih dan mengarahkan saya untuk pergi dekat dia lalu dia peluk saya sambil berdiri.

KS: May this evidence be in camera?

YA: Are you coming to that part?

MY: Yes, I’ m coming to that part. I leave it to the court. Read proviso s.50(2) Courts of Judicature Act 1964.

[04:54]

YA: This proceeding should be in camera.

At 9 am?

CV: Can it be 9.30 because I’m coming from Rawang.

YA: 1st proceeding 2mrw will be in camera.

Adjourned to 09:30 tomorrow.

2 comments:

IyouweBlog.com said...

thanks for the juice since i din read newspaper yet....
nanged you. nang this to meet the Tiger Lady of 2010!

cynic said...

ah... nice...

That's why i said AI can never be PM. They will screw him from the back instead... who's the asshole bandit now...?